Are Mallet Putters Better Than Blades? – Golf Myths Unplugged

Is Bigger Better?

Led by the TaylorMade Spider, we have seen more of the best golfers using mallet putters than ever before.  We wondered why.  Are there inherent advantages to using a mallet or are the Tour pros just trying something new?  More importantly, what’s better for the average golfer?

The Myths

Myth #1 – Mallet putters help you make more putts

Myth #2 – Mallet putters are easier to aim

Myth #3 – Mallet putters are more consistent

How We Tested

For this test, we gathered ten golfers with handicaps ranging from zero to twenty.  Each hit ten putts from ten feet, five with a mallet and five with a blade.  The putts were all done on the same indoor green, and every putt was measured by SAM Puttlab.

The putters used in this test were Edel Torque Balanced putters.  This allowed us to have the exact same toe hang, shaft length, head weight, swing weight, grip, and shaft for the two putters.  The only difference was the shape of the putter head.

All testing was done at and with the help of Club Champion.

The Results

Ultimately, putting is all about getting the ball in the cup, and the mallet putter did that more than the blade.  Our group total was 38 made putts by the mallet to 32 by the blade.

Looking at each tester individually, six made more putts with the mallet, three made more with the blade, and one made the same number with both.  What is particularly interesting is that of the six players who made more putts with the mallet, only three use a mallet as their gamer.  By contrast, all three players who made more putts with the blade use a blade putter regularly.

We can’t rate this myth as confirmed due to the small sample size, but it definitely makes us want to test this further.

While the mallet putter did get more balls into the cup, it did not help our testers aim.

Only three of our ten testers produced a better average aim with the mallet.  Even this number oversells the mallet’s alignment virtues, because a player could aim one putt 4 degrees right, aim another 4 degrees left, and end up with a perfect average aim.

That’s why we put more weight in the aim consistency ratings, and this number is even worse for the mallet.  Only one tester had better aim consistency with the mallet.  Five recorded significantly better aim consistency with the blade, and the other four were the same with both.

Thanks to the Puttlab data, we had a lot of ways to look at consistency.  All of them showed essentially the same thing: an even split between the blade and the mallet.

The numbers we took into account were face angle at impact, face angle consistency, rotational consistency, and impact spot consistency.  That means we were looking at where the club face was pointing at impact and how consistent the player was at that from stroke to stroke.  Rotational consistency shows how much the putter rotates open and closed from one putt to the next.  Finally, Puttlab assesses whether or not the player strikes the ball on the same spot on the face regularly or if they’re all over the place.

With each of these metrics, half the players were better with the blade, half were better with the mallet (though sometimes the differences were negligible).  What was surprising was that any given player could favor the mallet or blade depending on the metric.  For example, Player 3 had a better average face angle with the mallet but had a more consistent face angle with the blade.  His rotational consistency was better with the blade, but he hit the mallet in the same spot on the face.

Other Findings

The one thing that surprised me the most in the SAM Puttlab data was how much changing the putter shape changed our players’ swing paths.  I expected to see some players shift a degree or two, but a change that small was actually rare!

Half of our testers saw their average path shift more than 4 degrees when they changed putters.  Two players were nearly unaffected, shifting just 0.5 degrees.  The other three moved their path nearly 3 degrees each.

What this tells us is that making a putter change can dramatically change your stroke.  If you’re making a switch, give yourself time to adapt to the new flat stick before deciding if it’s a good change.


This test just scratches the surface of the research we plan to do on putters, but it does point to a predictable conclusion: the equipment you use can have a huge impact on your game.  Moreover, that impact is nearly impossible to predict.

As we saw, the mallet putter caused some players to swing the putter “worse” but more consistently.  Some players went the other way.  The bottom line is that, even on the greens, being fit into the right clubs can make a huge difference.

The Data


The following two tabs change content below.

Matt Saternus

Founder, Editor In Chief at
Matt is the Founder and Editor in Chief of Plugged In Golf. He's worked in nearly every job in the golf industry from club fitting to instruction to writing and speaking. Matt lives in the northwest suburbs of Chicago with his wife and two daughters.

Latest posts by Matt Saternus (see all)


  1. Overall weight and balance as well as face feel is important to me as opposed to the putter being a mallet or a blade style. I have used a center shafted semi-mallet (STX) for a long time and probably would tend to stay with that configuration going forward.

  2. The shape of the putter head, hosel, and sightlines all affect aim, and each of us is unique. This is the reason Edel fits people to a putter where the putter chooses you, not the other way around — the first objective is finding a putter that you can aim where you think you are aiming. Too many people select a putter based on its attractiveness, like people choose partners. But in real life as in partners, attractiveness wears off quickly when no fit exists.

  3. ChristopherKee

    I like this one. It’s a hard thing to measure but it’s always a blast to look at he data.

  4. Fantastic and more effective resources about putters. I really enjoyed this idea

  5. Shape of the head, offset, hosel type, and sight lines have a far greater impact on aim and performance than simply size of the head alone.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *