MORE Golf MOD/1 Irons Review

50 Words or Less

The MORE Golf MOD/1 irons are a thoroughly outside-the-box design.  Very unusual looks.  Easy to hit straight.  Solid forgiveness.

Introduction

Bruce Sizemore is a club maker who has been on my radar for over two decades.  Back when I was fully immersed in the world of boutique putters, Bruce was making premium flat sticks that were unafraid of being different.  He’s carried that boldness into his latest venture, MORE Golf.  Built on the idea of delivering more customization through fully modular clubs, you’ll never confuse a MORE Golf club for a Titleist or TaylorMade.  I tested their MOD/1 iron set to see how such an unusual set performs.

Looks

There is not a single angle from which the MORE Golf MOD/1 isn’t interesting.  At address, the first thing I noticed was the leading edge.  Much of the heel is shaved away, so much so that the bottom groove doesn’t extend all the way across the face.  Shifting to the toe side, you’ll notice a very square profile.

Finally, there’s the hosel.   The hosel meets the head more “up and in” than it does on a traditional iron.  In light of all these unusual features, the lack of a ferrule becomes an afterthought.

To touch on the normal points of interest, the top line is medium-wide with a sharp bevel on the back edge.  The club is fairly compact from heel-to-toe.  Depending on the flange attachment, the sole width is either on the thin or thick side of average.

The MOD/1 is even more eye-catching in the bag.  There’s a seemingly endless stream of shapes carved into the back, not to mention the logos and engravings.  Once your eye stops pinging around the milling, you’ll notice the large hex screw connecting the hosel to the club head and the removable flange.

All in all, this club is why the phrase “love it or hate it” was created.  It’s hard to imagine anyone feeling indifferent about this wildly original design.

Sound & Feel

I had no idea what to expect from the MORE MOD/1 irons in terms of sound and feel.  On one hand, billet milled sets the expectation for softness and precise feedback.  On the other hand, all the screws and bolts and modular pieces made me think that feel could have been overlooked completely.

What I found with the MOD/1 irons was a feel that is firm and a little heavy on the face.  I tend to like that more solid sensation over the fast, thin feeling, especially in the scoring irons.  The accompanying impact sound is a medium-loud knock at a mid-low pitch.  The sound and feel mesh perfectly.

I felt the feedback almost entirely through my hands.  The sound of impact didn’t change much between pure strikes and misses, but the impact location was clearly communicated in the feel.

What Does the MOD/1 Do?

Before I get into my evaluation of the MOD/1 irons, I want to run through the claims that MORE Golf makes about them.  Most eye-catching is the idea that “They want to fly straight.”  According to MORE the “up and in” position of the hosel means the club face wants to stay square and hit straight shots.  That hosel is also 50 grams lighter than conventional hosels, meaning there’s more weight in places where it’s useful to the golfer.

Additionally, MORE makes strong claims about their sole and flange.  They state that unless you want a lie angle more than two degrees flat, adjusting the lie is unnecessary because of the “dynamic shaping” of the sole and flange.  Because of the hosel-free leading edge, MORE claims that their irons produce better contact from a wider variety of lies.  Finally, the modular design means you can swap parts to better fit your swing and replace components as they wear out.  Suffice it to say, there’s a lot going on with the MOD/1 irons.

Performance

Let’s start with the most compelling idea, that the MOD/1 irons “want to fly straight.”  As much as I would love to pour cold water on this bold claim, I found it to be true.  During my testing, every time I looked up, the ball was curving substantially less than I expected.  Good swings weren’t good, they were laser straight.  Ugly shots fell next to the green, not 15 yards left of it.  When I tried to shape shots, it took a decent effort to create modest movement.  On their strongest claim, the MOD/1 irons deliver.

The MOD/1 irons are also unique in their turf interaction.  This was predictable as the leading edge is simply unlike anything else I’ve seen.  The club sails through the turf with less resistance than any other iron.

Next there’s the changeable flange.  As you can see above, it makes a noticeable difference to the sole width.  For me, it did not make a significant change to launch or spin.  However, I struck the ball much better with the thinner sole.  This makes a degree of sense as I tend to be shallow and generally favor thinner soles.  I do like that the MOD/1 irons give players options within the same head.

Finally, let’s touch on the overall performance of the MOD/1 irons.  I found the launch and distance to be in line with traditional cavity back irons, and the spin was just a hair below average.  All this makes sense as the lofts are about average for modern irons.  In terms of forgiveness, the MOD/1 is very forgiving until it isn’t.  Small misses are barely noticeable, but when you get to the perimeter of the face, the results can get ugly.

Conclusion

Every club maker claims to do things differently, but MORE Golf actually backs that up.  From the manufacturing techniques to the aesthetics to the performance, the MOD/1 irons are unlike anything I’ve ever hit before.  If you want your bag to stand out and your shots to fly straight, check these out.

Visit MORE Golf HERE

MORE Golf MOD/1 Iron Price & Specs

The following two tabs change content below.

Matt Saternus

Founder, Editor In Chief at PluggedInGolf.com
Matt is the Founder and Editor in Chief of Plugged In Golf. He's worked in nearly every job in the golf industry from club fitting to instruction to writing and speaking. Matt lives in the northwest suburbs of Chicago with his wife and two daughters.

Latest posts by Matt Saternus (see all)

12 Comments

  1. Oh my G-d. Those make PXG look like works of art. These look like castings that were rejected and given to a highschool shop class.

  2. I really like them, I would love to try them.
    There is so many nice iron set out there from small companies.
    I guess I can’t own every set I see.

  3. Somebody finally made a set of irons uglier than the Cleveland VAS. Gotta hand it to em, I didn’t think it could be done. Is Corey Pavin bagging these yet?

  4. Fascinating, reminds me of a transformer movie. I really don’t know what to say.

  5. Leland Crozier

    Pretty neat to see someone rock the boat like that on an iron design. I can’t decide if they are apocalyptic or futuristic but absolutely unique. Seems like there could be a lot of benefit from the shaved heel. Do you think any of the majors would contemplate such a change in design?

  6. Very intriguing. Nice to see something so different. Don’t know why, but reminds me slightly of the old ping isi irons.

  7. Definitely an interesting club. I didn’t see anything about where to see and demo these clubs. At $349 per club I would definitely want to hit them first.

  8. I think we now know who bought the old Cleveland VAS patents.

  9. At $349 per club, no thanks. Hitting shots a little straighter isn’t worth that much.

  10. Been playing these irons for a few months and I immediately threw my PXG gen 3’s to the back of the garage. You missed the benefits of the hosel placement. I play links courses with knee high rough. The MOD/1 gives a pure strike out of the rough since the hosel never gets grabbed by the grass like every other club on the market does. Great review Matt.

  11. Michael H

    Mine just arrived. These clubs are beautiful. Pictures don’t do them justice, at all. My wife also commented how technological and new age they look. Thanks for the reviews. No problem with price. I own a bicycle of which cost a lot more than these clubs.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

*