TaylorMade Truss Putter Review

50 Words or Less

The TaylorMade Truss putters are not for the purists.  Bizarre hosel design seems to make sense but doesn’t have a significant effect on performance.  Very firm feel.


As I noted in my recent review of the Spider S putter (check it out HERE), TaylorMade is a company that is not afraid to take chances with their putters.  When you swing for the fences, you will hit some home runs, as they did with the original Spider.  However, you also strike out a lot, which is what they’ve done with the new Truss putters.


Photographs of the TaylorMade Truss putters would have you believe that the unorthodox hosel design is not noticeable at address.  Don’t trust them.  In person, the address view is dominated by the hosel.  The hosel is even more noticeable from rear or face-on views, where it will turn a lot of heads much in the same way a car crash does.

The TaylorMade Truss is available in both blade and mallet shapes with two hosel designs each.  The Truss TB1 and TB2 are boxy, Anser 2-style putters.  Outside of the hosel, there’s nothing particularly good or bad about this take on the classic design.  The Truss TM1 and TM2 is a fang-style mallet.  There’s more space between the prongs than normal, and the flange is a bit longer.  Again, ignoring the hosel, it’s neither the best nor the worst of this style putter.

Sound & Feel

Many seasoned golfers like to say that “sound is feel,” but the TaylorMade Truss putters don’t follow that adage.  The feel of impact, even with a soft, urethane-covered golf ball, is very firm, bordering on hard.  What is incongruous is that the sound of impact is rather quiet.  Typically a putter that feels this firm would be much louder.

Thanks to the firm feel, there is plenty of feedback on strike quality through the hands.  However, because impact is so quiet, there is virtually no audio feedback.


Per TaylorMade, Truss was developed “for players who desire the stability and forgiveness of a mallet but prefer a more traditional look at address.”  As I stated earlier, they failed at maintaining a traditional look, at least to my eyes.  Based on my testing, they also failed to make these putters more stable and forgiving than their competitors.

In testing the Truss TB1, I did not feel any difference in twisting compared to typical Anser-style putters.  More importantly, I did not see a difference in the results.  Small mishits ended up in or near the cup with the Truss and standard Ansers.  Large mishits resulted in off-line putts that stopped short of the cup.  The same was true in comparing the TM2 to other fang-style putters.

As I mentioned earlier, both the blade and mallet heads each have two different hosel designs.  TaylorMade refers to them as “heel and center shafted,” but that should be taken with a grain of salt.  The TB1, which is “heel shafted,” is face-balanced just like a center-shafted putter.

Finally, as you can see above, the TaylorMade Truss putters have adjustable sole weights.  To offset the weight of the hosel, there is more weight in the toe of the TB1 and TM1 models.  The TM2 and TB2 models use the same weight in the heel and toe.  At the time of this writing, it is unclear if consumers can purchase weight kits from TaylorMade or not.


In my eyes, the TaylorMade Truss putters are a swing and a miss.  I don’t mind an unusual look if there’s a performance benefit, but I did not see one in either the blade or mallet designs.  Also, with a $300 price tag, I’d expect more in terms of aesthetics and feel.

The following two tabs change content below.

Matt Saternus

Co-Founder, Editor In Chief at PluggedInGolf.com
Matt is a golf instructor, club fitter, and writer living in the northwest suburbs of Chicago. Matt's work has been published in Mulligan Magazine, Chicagoland Golf, South Florida Golf, and other golf media outlets. He's also been a featured speaker in the Online Golf Summit and is a member of Ultimate Golf Advantage's Faculty of Experts.

Latest posts by Matt Saternus (see all)


  1. Christopher Shively

    I feel like one could have a field day of one liners poking fun at the TM truss putters:

    -Middle school cheerleaders say it best, U-G-L-Y you ain’t got no alibi! You ugly, hey hey you ugly!

    -Initial product development meeting at TM, someone speaks up, “You know how amazing those Bettinardi putters look? Yea….let’s do the opposite….”

    -Truss putters: the golf club equivalent of having to wear head gear braces.

    I kid, I kid. I’m sure there’s someone out there who will buy them.

  2. Jeff Houglum

    I always enjoy your honest assessments Matt. Keep up the great work.

    These putters will be featured in many spam emails by the end of the year at deep discounts from the bargain sites.

  3. The putter just doesn’t look right and the engineering concept of the truss design for a putter is a nonsense?
    It’s visually unappealing

  4. Yuck. That’s it. Nothing else is necessary.

  5. Truss … No Bueno … cough. cough $$$

    Thanks for clarifying everything I wanted to know about them.

  6. Joeg Voll

    I almost bought one! When you putt like I do, you’ll try anything! 1 handed putting, super short putter, left handed (I’m right handed, of course.) side saddle, claw grip, cross handed, belly-throat-chin-forehead anchoring, armlock, double armlock, double armlock w/ single leglock, double leglock w/single armlock, reverse double armlock, arch, no arch, sway stroke, toe hang, face balanced, negative lofted overspin….to name a few. Thankfully, I did my research, and this, my go-to club review site & reviewer, saved me from making this $300 blunder, so my finances are in good shape for the next big thing in putting. I have a feeling the next one will be THE ONE!
    As always, Thanks for another excellent, honest review!

  7. Every bit as ugly as the name. Not even a new concept – Ryder and Diawa had the very same hosel design back in the late 70s/early 80s. Future bargain bin fodder. Even so, I wouldn’t buy one for $20 let alone $300.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *