Srixon Q STAR TOUR Golf Ball Review

Srixon Q STAR TOUR Golf Ball_0001

50 Words or Less

The Srixon Q STAR Tour golf ball feels great, spins a ton, and will be very long for players who swing 85-95 MPH.


There are a lot of good golfers out there.  There are lots of players who demand a golf ball that feels great off the putter and wedges.  There aren’t a lot of golfers who swing a driver 100, 110, or 120 MPH.

If you thought about those three facts, you’d do what Srixon has done with the new Q STAR Tour: create a golf ball that feels great, spins like a tour ball, but performs best with moderate swing speeds.

Srixon Q STAR TOUR Golf Ball_0016


Soft.  Soft, soft, soft.  Really, really soft.  In every area of the game, soft is the word that defines the Q STAR Tour.  With the putter, the Q STAR Tour’s urethane cover creates a buttery “tock.”  The urethane cover also gives it a soft, sticky feel on the wedges.  When you get into the long game, the low compression keeps the feel soft and explosive.

Short Game

As has become their standard, Srixon shared a mountain of testing data about the Q STAR Tour.  Here are the Cliffs Notes.  The Q STAR Tour spun significantly more (+700 RPM or more) than the Wilson Staff Duo, Aerourner Pro, NXT Tour S, or e6 Soft.  It was within 300-400 RPM of urethane-covered tour balls like the ProV1, B330 RXS, and Chrome Soft.

My own testing of the Q STAR Tour against premium tour balls mirrored what Srixon reported.  On some shots, the Q STAR Tour hit the same peak spin numbers as the tour balls, but on average it was a couple hundred RPM lower.  For context, we’re talking about the difference between approximately 8000 RPM and 7800 RPM.  That difference is unlikely to be noticeable on the course.

Srixon Q STAR TOUR Golf Ball_0003

Long Game

Again, I’ll start with Srixon’s data.  Srixon states that with a robot swinging at 85 MPH and 95 MPH, the Q STAR Tour is longer than the Chrome Soft, Project A, B330 RXS, AeroBurner Pro, and Duo Spin.  Additionally, the Q STAR Tour had the smallest dispersion at 85 MPH and, with a 6I, had the highest launch and longest distance.

My testing of the Q STAR Tour didn’t replicate Srixon’s because my swing speed is not in the 85-95 MPH range.  As a higher swing speed player, I found the Q STAR Tour had ball speeds that were slightly lower with the driver compared to tour balls like the Z STAR.  The differences weren’t huge, but, with distance being critical, I would opt for the Z STAR.  With my irons, the differences between the Q STAR Tour and tour-caliber balls were smaller.  Bottom line: even as someone who is not the target demographic, I would be pretty happy playing the Q STAR Tour.  When my swing speed starts to dip, I will absolutely be turning to a ball like the Q STAR Tour.

Srixon Q STAR TOUR Golf Ball_0013


If you haven’t gotten the message, I’ll spell it out for you as clearly as I can: the Srixon Q STAR Tour golf ball is really good.  If you have swing speed in excess of 100 MPH, play the Z STAR, but everyone else should be stocking up on the Q STAR Tour.  And at $30/dozen, the value is tremendous.

Buy the Srixon Q STAR Tour Golf Ball HERE

The following two tabs change content below.

Matt Saternus

Co-Founder, Editor In Chief at
Matt is a golf instructor, club fitter, and writer living in the northwest suburbs of Chicago. Matt's work has been published in Mulligan Magazine, Chicagoland Golf, South Florida Golf, and other golf media outlets. He's also been a featured speaker in the Online Golf Summit and is a member of Ultimate Golf Advantage's Faculty of Experts.

Latest posts by Matt Saternus (see all)


  1. Pingback: Test & Review the New Srixon Q STAR Tour - Plugged In Golf

  2. I understand that personal testing is most important, however would like your opinion given your recent review of Bridgestone e6 Soft: Would you recommend the Q STAR Tour over the e6 Soft for high handicappers looking for “straight distance” off the tee?

    Both balls seem to target the same “moderate swing speed” golfer and the Q STAR Tour appears to have better greenside performance. That said, in the e6 Soft article you said “For the average or high handicap golfer… the spin gap that we’re talking about is NOT the difference between a shot sticking to the green and a shot that runs off the putting surface.”

    Long story, short, just trying to decide on which ball to start my season off with. Thanks and love the reviews~

    • Matt Saternus


      I haven’t tested the two head to head, so I can’t say definitively. I think both are really good. If straight is priority #1, I might try to e6 Straight first.



  3. Going to be hard to push the new Bridgestone e6 Soft out of my bag. But, I will give them a whirl.

  4. Richardpipon

    Still wait for your answer to try the Q star tour even if I paid for it

    • Matt Saternus


      Are you referring to the Reader Review opportunity? If so, the emails for that went out a couple weeks ago. We’d be happy to have you post your feedback about the ball here, however.



  5. In your view does the e6 Soft or e6 Speed compare with the Srixon Q Star Tour? Have been playing the QST, but want to try one of the new e6 balls.

    • Matt Saternus


      Neither compares in feel, in my opinion. The e6 Soft would be the closer of the two.



Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *